|
The
RBMK reactor
- The
RBMK is an unusual reactor design, one of
two to emerge in the Soviet Union.
- The
design has core characteristics which make
it prone to power surges.
- It
has no full containment structure.
- Major
modifications have been made to RBMK
reactors still operating.
The
Soviet designed RBMK is a pressurised water
reactor with individual fuel channels and using
ordinary water as its coolant and graphite as
its moderator. It is very different from most
other power reactor designs as it derived from a
design principally for plutonium production and
was intended and used for both plutonium and
power production.
The
combination of graphite moderator and water
coolant is found in no other power reactors. The
design characteristics of the reactor mean that
it is unstable at low power levels, and this was
shown in the Chernobyl accident. The instability
was due primarily to control rod design and a
positive void coefficient. A number of
significant design changes have now been made to
address these problems.
Features
of the RBMK
Fuel: Pellets of slightly-enriched
uranium oxide are enclosed in a zircaloy tube
3.65m long, forming a fuel rod. A set of 18 fuel
rods is arranged cylindrically in a carriage to
form a fuel assembly. Two of these end on end
occupy each pressure tube.
Pressure
tubes: Within the reactor each fuel assembly
is positioned in its own vertical pressure tube
or channel about 7 m long.. Each channel is
individually cooled by pressurised water which
is allowed to boil in the tube and emerges at
about 290° C.
Refuelling:
When fuel channels are isolated, these fuel
assemblies can be lifted into and out of the
reactor, allowing fuel replenishment while the
reactor is in operation.
Graphite
moderator: A series of graphite blocks
surround, and hence separate, the pressure
tubes. They act as a moderator to slow down the
neutrons released during fission so that a
continuous fission chain reaction can be
maintained. Conductance of heat between the
blocks is enhanced by a mixture of helium and
nitrogen gas.
Control
rods: Boron carbide control rods absorb
neutrons to control the rate of fission. A few
short rods, inserted upwards from the bottom of
the core, even the distribution of power across
the reactor. The main control rods are inserted
from the top down and provide automatic, manual
or emergency control. The automatic rods are
regulated by feedback from in-core detectors. If
there is a deviation from normal operating
parameters (e.g. increased reactor power level),
the rods can be dropped into the core to reduce
or stop reactor activity. A number of rods
normally remain in the core during operation.
Coolant:
Two separate water coolant systems each with
four pumps circulate water through the pressure
tubes to remove most of the heat from fission.
There is also an emergency core cooling system
which will come into operation if either coolant
circuit is interrupted.
Steam
separator: Steam from the heated coolant is
fed to turbines to produce electricity in the
generator. The steam is then condensed and fed
back into the circulating coolant.
Containment:
There is no secure containment in the sense
accepted in the West. The reactor core is
located in a concrete lined cavity that acts as
a radiation shield. The upper shield or pile cap
above the core, is made of steel and supports
the fuel assemblies. The steam separators of the
coolant systems are housed in their own concrete
shields.

Immediate
Safety Changes
After the accident at Chernobyl unit 4, the
primary concern was to reduce the positive void
coefficient. All operating RBMK reactors, in the
former Soviet Union therefore, had the following
changes implemented to improve operating safety:
- To
improve the operational reactivity margin,
the effective number of manual control rods
was increased from 30 to 45.
- The
installation of 80 additional absorbers in
the core to inhibit operation at low power.
- An
increase in fuel enrichment from 2% to 2.4%
to maintain fuel burnup with an increase in
neutron absorption (ie less reliance on
cooling water for this).
These
factors have reduced the positive void
coefficient from +4.5 b to +0.7 b , eliminating
the possibility of power excursion. Beta (b ) is
the delayed neutron fraction, which is neutrons
emitted from each fission with a measurable time
delay.
The
next consideration was to reduce the time taken
to shut the reactor down and eliminate the
positive void reactivity. Improvements include:
- Scram
(rapid shut down) rod insertion time cut
from 18 to 12 seconds.
- The
redesign of control rods.
- The
installation of a fast scram system.
- Precautions
against unauthorised access to emergency
safety systems.
Redesign
of the control rods.
179
of 211 control rods are inserted into the core
from the top. To improve their effectiveness,
they are equipped with "riders" fixed
to their bottom end but with a gap between the
rider and the bottom tip of the control rod.
Approximately 1.0m water columns remained under
and above it. When the control rod is in its
uppermost position, the rider is in the control
rod cooling tube within the fuelled region of
the core. The rider being made substantially of
graphite, is almost transparent to neutrons,
while water, which would occupy the tube
otherwise, plays as an absorber. When the
reactor is "poisoned" with xenon and
with partially inserted control rods, the major
part of the power is produced within the lower
region of the core. This means that when the rod
started to move down from its uppermost
position, the rider removed water from the lower
part, causing an increase in reactivity and
hence in power.
Longer-term
modifications
In
addition to the safety changes, it was decided
that RBMKs should be modified more
fundamentally. Chernobyl unit 1 was relicensed
for operation in October 1995, following
extensive maintenance which included the removal
of some fuel channels to evaluate the metal and
some backfitting as follows. The modification
process consists of:
- Replacement
of the fuel channels at all units except
Smolensk-3.
- Replacement
of the group distribution headers and
addition of check valves.
- Improvements
to the emergency core cooling systems.
- Improvements
of the reactor cavity over-pressure
protection systems.
- Replacement
of the process computer, SKALA.
|
Positive
void coefficient
Positive
void coefficient is a term often
associated with the RBMK reactors, the
type involved in the Chernobyl disaster.
Reactors that have a positive void
coefficient can be unstable at low power
and are prone to experiencing a rapid,
uncontrollable power increase. While
reactors other than the RBMK type have
positive void coefficients, they
incorporate design features to prevent
such instability from occurring.
In
a water cooled reactor steam may
accumulate to form pockets, known as
voids. If excess steam is produced,
creating more voids than normal, the
operation of the reactor is disturbed,
because
*
the water is a more efficient coolant
than steam
*
the water acts as a moderator (to
enhance the fission reaction) and
neutron absorber (hindering it) while
steam barely does so.
A
reactor is said to have a positive void
coefficient if excess steam voids lead
to increased power generation, and a
negative void coefficient if excess
steam voids leads to a decrease in
power. The quantum of the coefficient is
simply a measure of the speed of change
of state of the reactor.
When
the void coefficient is strongly
positive, the power can increase very
rapidly because any power increment that
occurs leads to increased steam
generation, which in turn leads to a
further increase in power. Such positive
feedback processes are, therefore, very
difficult to control.
When
the void coefficient is negative, excess
steam generation will tend to shut down
the reactor. This is, of course, is a
safety feature.
Most
of the world’s
operating power reactors have negative
void coefficients. In those reactors
where same water circuit acts as both
moderator and coolant, excess steam
generation reduces the slowing of
neutrons necessary to sustain the
nuclear chain reaction. This leads to a
reduction in power.
In
some reactor designs however, the
moderator and coolant are in separate
circuits, or are of different materials.
In these reactors, excess steam reduces
the cooling of the reactor, but as the
moderator remains intact the nuclear
chain reaction continues.
In
some of these reactors, most notably the
RBMK, the neutron absorbing properties
of the cooling water are a significant
factor in the operating characteristics.
In such cases, the reduction in neutron
absorption as a result of steam
production, and the consequent presence
of extra free neutrons, enhances the
chain reaction. This enhances power
production which causes additional
heating. The additional heat raises the
temperature in the cooling circuit and
more steam is produced. More steam means
less cooling and less neutron
absorption, and the problem gets worse.
This
positive feedback can occur very
rapidly, potentially leading to a
serious accident such as at Chernobyl
unit 4 in 1986 where the power peaked at
several hundred times the normal full
rating. The coolant vapourised and
reacted with the zirconium cladding to
produce hydrogen which then exploded and
destroyed the core, dispersing about 5%
of it to the outside environment.
In
order to avoid problems with positive
void coefficient there are two
approaches. Either the reactor
characteristics can be altered to reduce
the positive void coefficient, or
systems can be provided that will shut
the reactor down very quickly if an
increase in power is detected. Since the
Chernobyl disaster, the RBMK reactor
design has been altered and units have
been equipped to protect them against
the runaway effects of the positive void
coefficient.
There
are currently 13 RBMKs in the world and
one under construction due for
commercial operation in 2003. The
reactors have a net generating capacity
of 12545 MWe. The operating till dates
are the scheduled shut down for these
plants.
|
There
are currently 13 RBMKs in the world, in Russia
and Lithuania, and one more under construction
in Russia (Kursk-5) due for commercial operation
in 2003. The reactors have a net generating
capacity of 12,545 MWe. All operating RBMKs
began operation between 1973 (Leningrad-1) and
1990 (Smolensk-3). There are currently three
distinct generations of reactors having
significant differences with respect to their
safety design features: ·
- The
four first-generation units are Leningrad-1
and -2, and Kursk-1 and -2. They were
designed and brought on line in the
early-to-mid 1970s, before new standards on
the design and construction of nuclear power
plants (OPB-82) were introduced in the
Soviet Union.
- Second-generation
RBMKs, brought on line since the late 1970s
and early 1980s include Leningrad-3 and -4;
Kursk-3, and -4; Ignalina-1; and Smolensk-1
and -2. Ignalina-2 contains safety features
beyond those of other second generation
units. These units conform to updated
standards issued in 1982.
- After
the Chernobyl accident, Soviet safety
standards were revised again (OPB-88). One
RBMK (Smolensk-3) has been built to these
third-generation standards. Additional
design changes now are being incorporated in
the construction of Kursk-5.
The
'operating till' dates in the following table
are the scheduled shut down for these plants.
However, Russia has adopted a policy of
extending plant life, aiming to add a further 10
years to their operation. Lithuania, on the
other hand, is likely to close Ignalina early as
a condition for entry into the European Union.
Russia's long-term plans include the possibility
of replacing the Leningrad units, at the end of
their extended service life, by new MKER-1000
units. These are a modification of the RBMK
design. The main differences are in the spacing
of the graphite lattice in the core and the
incorporation of passive safety systems.
|
Location
|
Unit
|
Commercial
Operation
|
Unit
net capacity (MWe)
|
Status
|
|
Lithuania
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ignalina
|
1
|
1984
|
1
250
|
Operating
till May 2004
|
|
2
|
1987
|
1
250
|
Operating
till August 2018
|
|
Russia
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kursk
|
1
|
1977
|
700
|
Operating
till October 2007
|
|
2
|
1979
|
700
|
Operating
to August 2009
|
|
3
|
1984
|
950
|
Operating
till March 2014
|
|
4
|
1986
|
950
|
Operating
till February 2016
|
|
5
|
-
|
950
|
Due
for commercial operation 2003
|
|
Leningrad
|
1
|
1974
|
950
|
Operating
till November 2004
|
|
2
|
1976
|
950
|
Operating
till February 2006
|
|
3
|
1980
|
950
|
Operating
till June 2010
|
|
4
|
1981
|
950
|
Operating
till August 2011
|
|
Smolensk
|
1
|
1983
|
950
|
Operating
till Dec ember2013
|
|
2
|
1990
|
950
|
Operating
till July 2015
|
|
3
|
1990
|
950
|
Operating
till July 2023
|
|